RSS
 

Archive for June, 2011

A Flowchart For Fixers

13 Jun

white trash repairs - A Flowchart For Fixers


To see life and pop culture graphed for your inner geek, check out Graph Jam!



Submitted by:

Wyldesoul

Submitting 1 LOL

 
 

New Service to Open Source Custom URL Schemes for iOS Developers

13 Jun

Zwapp icon 150x150From the makers of mobile app discovery service Zwapp, there comes OneMillionAppSchemes.com, a new initiative which aims to open source the unpublished custom URL schemes for iOS applications. For those unaware, a custom URL scheme is a way for apps to communicate with each other and do other smart things. For example, custom URL schemes allow other apps or Web pages to call the app, trigger it and send data to it, or even transfer data between lite and paid app versions.

Apple's built-in apps like Safari, the Phone app, the Messaging app, Email and others have URL schemes included by default. Developers using the iOS SDK can built their own, too. Unfortunately, though, there isn't a well-maintained master list of these custom URLs anywhere on the Web.

Sponsor

Because Zwapp wants to use the custom URL schemes for app detection purposes, it needs a master list like this to better function. But instead of building up such list in private, the company has launched an open source initiative to improve inter-app communications for all iOS developers, allowing everyone to contribute and benefit from the work.

How OpenMillionAppSchemes.com Works

The site went live just last week, and uses an open source Mac-only tool to scan your iTunes library in order to locate these custom URL schemes. The data that is scanned is uploaded to the site and is instantly accessible to all developers. No personal or private data is scanned or made public, says Alexander van Elas, Zwapp's founder.

Zwapp app schemes

Already, over 8,300 apps had been donated to this project by the end of last week, and as of this morning, that number has climbed to 9,517.  As awareness grows, even more apps should come soon.

To access the data, Zwapp has made a JSON API available to developers. The list is also available on the website for manual perusal and searching.

In Zwapp's App

At present, Zwapp does not use the data from OneMillionApps in its iOS application, which scans your device to determine what apps are on your phone so you can share those with friends. Currently, it only detects 25-50% of the apps you have installed on its first run, and more are found as you start using the app. However, the scan results from the new service will be included in Zwapp shortly and this will lead to much better first-run scores, van Elas explains.

In the meantime, developers or end users wishing to contribute to the project can do so here.

Discuss

 
 

Detroit DIYer cooks up stronger, lighter steel, shames scientists

11 Jun
Flash Bainite
You'd be forgiven for dismissing an amateur metallurgist if he claimed to have improved upon the presumably perfected technology of steel making. But Flash Bainite, the creation of Detroit entrepreneur Gary Cola, wowed a team of Ohio State University engineers by turning centuries of alloy processing on its head. Instead of heating the metal for hours or days, this well-equipped DIYer boosted the temperature -- quickly baking, then cooling sheets of steel that are 7-percent stronger than other forms and tougher than some titanium alloys. Flash Bainite is also more ductile than other steels, allowing it to crumple more before breaking -- perfect for absorbing impacts. Obviously this means stronger and lighter cars, laptops, and armored vehicles but, since the process takes all of about 10 seconds, it's also more energy efficient and cheaper than traditional steel making. Now, who has the number for the Nobel Prize committee?

Detroit DIYer cooks up stronger, lighter steel, shames scientists originally appeared on Engadget on Sat, 11 Jun 2011 17:02:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceEurekAlert  | Email this | Comments
 
 

97% of Mobile Web Response Time Is On the Front-End

10 Jun

Strangeloop logo Strangeloop president Joshua Bixby decided to take a look at Steve Souders' old claim that 80% of performance issues happen at the front-end. It turns out that for desktop browsers, that number is now at around 85%. But for mobile Web browsers, the number is more like 97%. He published the results here.

Regarding how large the mobile Web's front-end response time, Bixby wrote "I expected this number to be higher than the desktop number, but not this high."

Sponsor

Desktop Web browser performance vs. mobile Web browser performance

Mobile browser times

And yes, before any asks, I'm quite sure that by iPad3 and iPad4 he means an iPad running iOS 3 and one running iOS 4.

I would have liked to have seen Opera Mini/Mobile on these lists, since it's supposed to do much of the rendering usually reserved for the front-end on the back-end. Then again, BlackBerry was supposed to start doing that and it doesn't seem to have done any better than the other browsers tested.

Bixby admits these tests are not the last word on the subject, and needs to conduct further tests - particularly comparing different carrier networks and network types.

Discuss

 
 

80% of Engagement with Tweets is Clicking a Link (Rather than Reply or RT)

10 Jun
Twitter has announced a new link-shortening service embedded into Twitter.com. The new feature will allow users to put in a full URL and have it shortened to 19 total characters (one character shorter than bit.ly) automatically, but will continu...
 
 

Is it Time for Two-Factor Authentication?

10 Jun

securID.jpgThe recent security breach at Citibank, coupled with even RSA hiring what may be its first Chief Security Officer Edward Schwartz, point out that you can never be too paranoid about your personal and corporate data security. RSA was in the news earlier this year for an attach on its SecurID two-factor tokens, something that had been considered the ultimate in enterprise security.

It might be time to take another look at two-factor authentication, and see if it makes sense to implement this in your organization. Here are three basic steps to get started:

Sponsor

First, take a look at what Google and Facebook have done with adding two-factor authentication to their accounts. Both use somewhat similar systems, tying your account to your cell phone and sending you a text message that you have to enter as part of your login process. Google adopted two-factor authentication last fall and Facebook added two-factor to their accounts in May. And eBay/PayPal have had two-factor authentication for several years on its accounts, too. While these are all personal solutions, they help gain experience in using these two-factor solutions and give you some perspective before you want to implement these corporate-wide.

Second, look at adding two-factor security to two of your most common entry points: email and VPN access. Both will mean some end-user training and will require some effort to implement, but there are a wide variety of solutions.

In addition to RSA, there are several other two-factor authentication token vendors, some that use texting to phones and some that offer their own hardware or software-based tokens.

  • PhoneFactor has a similar system to Google and Facebook, texting codes to your cell phone. They can secure a wide variety of systems, including VPNs, Outlook Web Access and others, and offer a free version for up to 25 users. For larger populations, they also will credit you $15 per each RSA SecurID token towards any new deployment.
  • Digital Persona offers both SMB and enterprise versions of their software that can use a wide variety of tokens and methods for two-factor authentication, set up whole disk encryption, and other security measures. They also offer a free trial. Here is an example of their administrative console.
    digital persona console.jpg

  • Symantec/Verisign offers a variety of user authentication solutions here, including tokens similar to SecurID.They have a free 30-day trial as well as a free credential you can download to your smartphone. And they also will rebate $5 for every RSA token or credential replaced with their VIP Authentication Service until September 30, 2011.
  • Yubico's Yubikey offers USB-key tokens starting at $25, along with keys that come with the Verisign credentials built-in.
  • SecureAuth Identity Enforcement Program has a similar product to SecurID and offers a quick start promotion running until September for $10 per user per year.
  • VMware's Horizon App Manager has taken software from its Tricipher acquisition and is using two-factor authentication to secure cloud-based apps.
  • Finally, if you still need convincing, re-read our story that covers some options from Forrester Research here. If you haven't yet started on any of these strategies, pick one and get going. Any action is better than nothing.

    Discuss

     
     

    Worst American Presidents

    09 Jun

    The most prominent politician posts have led to some discussions of the worst American presidents. I have Buchanan at the bottom. Scott finds Andrew Johnson even more detestable. I think that in lieu of a state list tonight, I want to produce a worst presidents list.

    I also want to be clear that presidents are being judged strictly for their time in office. What they do before or after is irrelevant.

    1. James Buchanan. Scott makes a powerful argument for Johnson. I’m going to stick with Buchanan though, as much for the sake of argument as anything else. When the nation is literally collapsing around you and your response is to let the next guy handle it, well, that’s pretty loathsome. Buchanan was a bad president all around, a northerner completely under the thumb of the Southern slave power (see the Lecompton Constitution for one piece of evidence). But it’s for his response to succession that he gets the title of worst president.

    2. Andrew Johnson. I’ve long had Pierce here. But Scott’s convinced me at least this far. Johnson did have a wide range of actions he could have taken. He chose the worse. Without good reason, I’ve always been a little less harsh on him than Buchanan or Pierce because no one elected him president. So some of the blame falls on Lincoln and his endless obsession with luring supposed loyal white southerners back into the Union. This might have been Lincoln’s greatest weakness and one wonders how harshly he would have treated the white South after the war. But he couldn’t have done a worse job than Johnson. That would be impossible.

    3. Franklin Pierce. The Kansas-Nebraska Act. Enough said. Weak and worthless.

    4. Richard Nixon. People always say that Nixon signed all this good legislation, etc. And that’s true, even though he didn’t want to do any of it. But for permanently changing how Americans see the presidency and politicians in general, he deserves out loathing. Take out Vietnam and Cambodia and he still belongs here.

    5. John Tyler. Tyler got some discussion in the comment threads about worst president. I put him here not because he committed treason in 1861, but because he did more than anyone in the 1840s to move this nation toward Civil War. Seeing that he had no chance of being nominated by the Democrats or the Whigs in 1844, he decided to throw his horse fully behind John C. Calhoun and southern extremism, hoping to build support that way. He named Calhoun as Secretary of State, leading to the Pakenham Letter and extreme embarrassment for non-slaveholding Americans. His aggressive moves to annex Texas furthered northern belief in a southern slaveholding conspiracy. Awful.

    6. George W. Bush. It drove me nuts during the Bush Administration when people routinely called Bush the worst president ever. He is very, very bad. We can pray he’ll be the worst of the 21st century. Torture, disastrous economic policies, Iraq, etc., are all good reasons for him to be at the bottom of the list. And honestly, if the economy continues to plummet, Bush’s reputation may actually go even lower. But for all of this, he’s clearly not as bad as Buchanan, Johnson, and Pierce. You could arguably put him 4th and I wouldn’t complain.

    7. Warren Harding. Tolerated tremendous amounts of corruption, a total non-entity of a leader. Essentially worthless. The people who work at the Warren Harding home disputed this characterization of him when I visited there, pointing to various treaties and his collection of fraternal hats and bicycles. It was very exciting.

    8. Herbert Hoover. In some ways I feel bad for Hoover. A better man than Harding or Coolidge in almost every way, at a different time he might have made a good president. But he was a disaster for the Great Depression. Unable to comprehend that the government had a role to play in fighting the Depression, he let the country reach its lowest point since the Civil War. He was also a nasty, nasty racist, but I guess that shouldn’t matter here. Also, signing the Smoot-Hawley Tariff.

    9. Calvin Coolidge–generally a bad person in almost all areas. Vetoed the Bonus Act to give World War I vets a pension (later immortalized in the Bonus Army). Supported the immigration restrictions that led to the Immigration Act of 1924. Opposed the entire Progressive Era legislative package, which he had fought as Governor of Massachusetts and which he did nothing to promote during his years in office. Vastly reduced taxes on rich people. His only redeeming quality was that he was generally less openly racist than many politicians of the time, disliking the complete exclusion of the Japanese in the Immigration Act (not that this stopped him from signing it) and promoting citizenship for Native Americans.

    And a curveball for #10.

    10. James Madison. The War of 1812 was so incredibly stupid that Madison deserves this spot. The war nearly cost the nation its existence. A great man. A bad president.

    One could make an argument for Jefferson in this spot as well, as the Embargo was arguably the single worst foreign policy mistake in American history. And he nearly botched the Louisiana Purchase, the easiest call in American foreign policy history.

    I really wanted to put Reagan on here. But I can’t help but give the bastard credit for not listening to the crazies in his administration and talking to Gorbachev. For everything else, he’s awful. For being realistic about what he could do with the Soviet Union despite his rhetoric, I suppose Grandpa Caligula deserves a touch of credit.

    I also think Gerald Ford and Millard Fillmore both suck. And of course Hayes, Cleveland, Harrison, and most of the other Gilded Age presidents are somewhere between bad and very bad. Arguments could be made for Cleveland and Hayes particularly.

    As you can probably tell, I would argue that most of our presidents have been mediocre or worse. How the nation succeeded despite the often terrible leadership at the top is for another post.

     
     

    Outsourced Tech Jobs Returning to the U.S. [Infographic]

    09 Jun

    We've covered the increased demand for IT professionals here recently and outlined which skills are in highest demand. Now Modis, an IT staffing firm, has released some additional data on what jobs are in demand and why.

    This infographic looks at the best cities to find tech jobs (which we already covered here), why companies are keeping talent in-house and the hottest job titles.

    Sponsor

    modis_infographic_0611.png
    Infographic via Modis

    Photo by Aldo Gonzalez

    Discuss

     
     

    The Paleolithic Diet InfoGraphic

    09 Jun

    Revealed here for the first time. And as I said, it's big.

    Paleolithic Diet Explained
    Learn more about the Paleo Diet

    Access the full-size version here.

    This is the work of Patrick Vlaskovits whom I've had the privilege of knowing for quite a while now. We regularly grab lunch together when he's on business up here Bay Area and we talk about the Paleo movement in general.

    Patrick is also the founder of the very popular PaleoHacks and now, PaleolithicDiet.com the Newsletter.

    From Patrick:

    1. PaleolithicDiet.com has one simple mission: Responsibly steward Paleo / primal / evolutionary / ancestral eating as it goes mainstream.
    2. The Paleo Diet is a broad and flexible meta-rule (rule about rules): Eat in an evolutionary appropriate manner for our species. That's it. Full Stop.
    3. Let's have some fun while we're doing #1

    To help spread the word about Paleolithic Diet, I have created the infographic Richard has embedded in this post. I hope you enjoy it. Please spread tweet & share it far and wide. If you have a blog, you can even embed it.

    So help spread the word by sharing this post with your Facebook friends and Twitter followers.

    Related posts:

    1. A Modest Bleg to Promote the Primal Lifestyle
    2. Administrivia
    3. A Year of Free the Animal Visitor Statistics in Review
    4. Public Service Announcement: Paleo Diet Study
    5. How the Paleo Diet Works

     
     

    Five important lessons Mark Zuckerberg taught us about business

    09 Jun

    Advertise here with BSA


    You don’t get to 600 million friends without doing something spectacular. Mark Zuckerberg knows this more than anyone. But I wonder: do we have any hope of achieving similar success?

    Facebook’s story begins, like most businesses, with a single idea and an ambitious person that executes it. Zuckerberg wasn’t a world-class genius, and Facebook was hardly a revolutionary idea. Yet here we stand: Facebook is one of the most valuable websites on the Internet, Zuckerberg is one of the world’s youngest billionaires, and MySpace… let’s not pick on them.

    There wasn’t any magic, fate, or destiny at play here — anyone could’ve been in Zuckerberg’s position. However, just because anyone on this planet has the potential to achieve success, doesn’t mean that anyone else actually will.

    There are factors at play: things like leadership, experience, timing, funding, and execution play their roles. But some things will always stand out above the rest, and many of the factors that really make a difference will never be taught at an ordinary business school. So let’s steal a few pages from Mark Zuckerberg’s school of business.

    Lesson 1: Be passionate about what you do

    If there is any way to create something that hundreds, thousands, or even millions of people will eventually use on a daily basis, you better be sure to create something that you would have passion and dedication in creating.

    The aforementioned isn’t exactly a revelation to anyone, but if you are not genuinely interested in what you are creating, why would anyone else be? They wouldn’t. It’s a serious problem for many entrepreneurs of both young and old.

    Lately we have seen entrepreneurs creating this businesses that some have little interest in actually investing their heart and soul into. Some of these startups look great on paper, but, in the end, the whole intention is to quickly flip these businesses to a company that has plenty of cash on hand. The investors, founders, and, if they’re lucky, employees get rich and everyone goes out for drinks to celebrate. If this is the measure of success, it is no wonder why we hear so much discussion about a potential tech bubble.

    Mark Zuckerberg, however, is one of the most prominent examples in recent history of someone who has the passion. Not only did he care about his project, but he also turned down billions of dollars in order to let his company thrive. Turning away billions of dollars, and the opportunity to never have to work again, can’t be that difficult. Can it?

    But the reality is that you, me, everyone needs to be reminded every once in a while that having a dedication and passion for what we do in life is key to happiness.


    Lesson 2: Constant evaluation

    There are generally two types of people in business: those who prefer to play it by gut instinct and those who analyze every little measurable detail. Both have their pros and cons; having a mix of both couldn’t hurt. Generally a person gravitates towards one or the other.

    Mark Zuckerberg is the analyzer.

    Zuckerberg always insisted that his employees create powerful analytics dashboards. Their purpose was simple: allow him and fellow employees to gauge the interest in newly released features to coordinate their global domination. While other companies were still figuring out which advertisements could be placed at which spot and generate the most return, Facebook focused on optimizing the performance of the user experience. He wanted to know which features worked and which did not.

    Those who can gather enough data to garner an understanding of their users, while also being able to determine which features work and which do not, will ultimately be in a better position to achieve success.

    The takeaway: do anything in your power (within reason, of course) to find ways to measure success and failure across the board, but don’t get so caught up in the data that you are unwilling to explore new avenues.


    Lesson 3: Be willing to experiment

    In Facebook’s infancy, its founder preferred to push out enhancements and never look back. This is, admittedly, easy to do when you have a few thousand users; they expect things to change at a rapid clip. But Facebook was different. People relied on Facebook in more ways than most other websites — it was a service that connected people to each other. At this point, failure is unacceptable.

    Still, Zuckerberg preferred the gung ho method of development. He would regularly introduce new features — adding the “Wall,” introducing chat functionality, allowing third-party development, and changing the site’s layout (which I have had numerous complaints about before).

    One has to admire the company’s insistence on pushing out features in a world where critical services tend to iterate slowly and safely (think Microsoft Windows). This insured that Facebook was a step ahead of the competition while also appearing innovative amidst growing competition.

    Sure, there were those who didn’t appreciate these drastic changes (especially those dealing with privacy settings and layout), but when you have a vision, sometimes it pays to put in the extra effort and take the risk; explore it through to the end.


    Lesson 4: Be aware of opportunity

    Before Facebook, there was CourseMatch, an application that allowed students at Harvard University to compare their course selections for that semester. With this, Zuckerberg indulged students’ desires to know which classes their friends were joining. He exploited an opportunity.

    Facemash was a similar expereince. It was Harvard’s Hot or Not for students. These students were interested in knowing where they stood socially — in some ways, we all do. And Zuckerberg, once again, saw an opportunity to exploit this as well.

    Facebook was simply a culmination of all these previous opportunities into a single useful package.

    It isn’t magic. But it does require looking at things in a different way — to see things for what they could be, as opposed to only what they have been or currently are. Zuckerberg’s ability to notice these opportunities and execute on them gave him the edge in creating and maintaining products that people believed in.

    Opportunity exists everywhere — especially with the Internet, where the ability to reach millions is easier than ever. Perhaps there is so much opportunity out there that, perhaps, we have become ignorant to spot the most obvious of opportunities. But being able to spot opportunity is an invaluable skill.


    Lesson 5: Make something useful

    Facebook isn’t simply another interesting website to visit every once in a while. It is a tool that millions of people use to connect to each other. People use it for sharing experiences and creating new ones. Most importantly, Facebook does something that no other website has been able to do as efficiently, effectively, and with such impressive scale: it creates a virtual environment to interact with your real friends.

    I don’t think it is necessary for me to explain how useful something like this is; the 600 million plus members does that well enough. Yet it is this usefulness that makes the company a success. It is a recurring theme that all successful companies build upon. It is also something that many startups don’t seem to comprehend.

    If you want the best business advice out there, here it is: create something useful.

    Explaining what makes a product or service useful is simple: it is something that people are using repeatedly and on a regular basis. Make something that you and others could use on a regular basis, and make this thing unique. If you do this, along with everything else mentioned here, you will have an opportunity to create and maintain a successful business.

    And who knows? Maybe you will be the one creating the next Facebook killer.



    What have you learned from Mark Zuckerberg’s success? Share your own lessons below or let us know what you think about the ones mentioned on this article…

    Written exclusively for WDD by James Mowery. He is a passionate technology journalist and entrepreneur who has written for various top-tier publications like Mashable and CMSWire. Follow him on Twitter: @JMowery.


    If you find an exclusive RSS freebie on this feed or on the live WDD website, please use the following code to download it: O1Rs1S



    WordPress hosting for a full year for only $70


    Source